Skip to main content

State v. Irby

Citations

  • 254 S.W.3d 181
  • 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 490
  • 2008 WL 927706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a witness's videotaped statement, inconsistent with his trial testimony, was admissible to contradict his claim that police coerced the prior statement
  • explaining that the Confrontation Clause is not violated where the witness is unavailable and has given testimony in a previous judicial proceeding and was subject to cross-examination by the defendant
  • where the reviewing court declined to address an argument unsupported by authority
  • “To preserve an alleged error, a party must make a timely and specific objection at trial. The 5 objection cannot be broadened by arguing a new theory on appeal.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nannette A. Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.