McKellip v. Sorrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the § 924(a) knowledge requirement applies only to the possession element of § 922(g)(1), not to the interstate nexus or to felon status”
• “We agree with the decisions from other circuits that the § 924(a) knowledge requirement applies [for a person charged with being a felon in possession] only to the possession element of § 922(g)(1), not to the interstate nexus or to felon status.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Bobby Der Enslin, AKA Bobby De Enslin, Bobby Enslin D
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-04-24· cited 87×
• State v. Nicklasson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1998-03-24· cited 86×
• State v. Dodd
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-12-07· cited 44×
• United States v. Graves
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-05-05· cited 28×
• State v. Link
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-03-30· cited 17×
• State v. Shaw
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-12-28· cited 16×
• State v. Robinson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-05-09· cited 14×
• United States v. Montero-Camargo
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-05-13· cited 13×
• State v. McClanahan
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-10-02· cited 10×
• State v. Derrick
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-03-20· cited 9×
• United States v. Bobby Der Enslin, AKA Bobby De Enslin, Bobby Enslin D
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-01-13· cited 7×
• 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3411, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4780, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5866 United States of America v. Lyndon Lloyd Graves
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-04