State v. Dixon
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3759
Syllabus
Judgment affirmed. The trial court made all of the necessary findings at the sentencing hearing to impose consecutive sentences and consecutive sentences were not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. The defendant also failed to show that he was prejudiced and denied a fair and just hearing after the trial court ordered his removal from the sentencing hearing for being an obstreperous defendant.
Judges: Klatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BaskinOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-28· cited 16×
- State v. AliOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-24· cited 11×
- State v. HoyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-23· cited 7×
- State v. RichardsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-24· cited 4×
- Elevation Ents., Ltd. v. NMRD, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-14· cited 3×
- State v. BriggsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-29· cited 2×
- State v. VokasOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-18· cited 1×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-14
- State v. LampertOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-05
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1983-08-24· cited 530×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 18×
- State v. HairstonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-28· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.