Skip to main content

State v. Dixon

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 3759

Syllabus

Judgment affirmed. The trial court made all of the necessary findings at the sentencing hearing to impose consecutive sentences and consecutive sentences were not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. The defendant also failed to show that he was prejudiced and denied a fair and just hearing after the trial court ordered his removal from the sentencing hearing for being an obstreperous defendant.

Judges: Klatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.