Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/14/2022
State v. Smith
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 420
Syllabus
Because the trial court made the findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) before imposing consecutive sentences and those findings are supported by the record, defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record or otherwise contrary to law.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. NienbergOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-22· cited 63×
- State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 18×
- State v. LucasOhio Supreme Court· 2003-09-24· cited 17×
- State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-18· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.