State v. Watkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the State may question a defendant regarding his or her prior convictions if the court finds that the probative value of the evidence outweighs the prejudicial effect
• “The rule only requires the trial court to independently weigh the probative value of the prior conviction against the prejudicial effect. In this case, the court did all that the rule requires. We find no abuse of discretion____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Harding
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-05-30· cited 46×
• State v. Reffitt
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-07-10· cited 44×
• Quinonez on Behalf of Quinonez v. Andersen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-09-27· cited 33×
• State v. Beasley
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-06-12· cited 33×
• State v. Hunter
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-06-07· cited 19×
• State v. Moya
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-09-01· cited 11×
• State v. Ritacca
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-05-30· cited 10×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-12-13· cited 9×
• State v. Dickson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-04· cited 7×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-11-29· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dixon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-07-30· cited 34×
• State v. Watkins
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-07-10· cited 28×
• State v. Noble
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-05-29· cited 17×
• State v. Heath
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-02-15· cited 7×
• State v. Francis
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-11-13· cited 2×