State v. Dippre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s possession of one large bag of 12.77 grams of methamphetamine along with a scale, unused plastic bag- gies, and tin foil constituted a substantial step towards the crime of delivery
• conducting plain-error review of entry of conviction for unlawful delivery of a controlled substance, where the controlling law at the time of trial was State v. Boyd, 92 Or App 51, 756 P2d 1276, rev den, 307 Or 77 (1988
• evidence of 12.77 grams of methamphetamine, a scale, unused plastic baggies, and tin foil legally sufficient to establish substan- tial step toward delivery, resulting in remand for entry of attempted delivery conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Horton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-07-26· cited 98×
• State v. Wesley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-22· cited 9×
• State v. Chan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-20

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Boyd
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-07-06· cited 71×
• State v. Hubbell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-29· cited 43×
• State v. Ross
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-02-25· cited 13×
• State v. Fischer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-20· cited 9×
• State v. Buell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-24· cited 8×
• State v. Martineau
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-16· cited 8×
• State v. Newsted
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-05· cited 5×