State v. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a trial court is required “to instruct the jury that Oregon law requires a unanimous guilty verdict for all charges and permits a not-guilty verdict by a vote of 11-to-1 or 10-to-2”
• concluding that a trial court is required “to instruct the jury that Oregon law requires a unanimous guilty verdict for all charges and permits a not-guilty verdict by a vote of 11 to one or 10 to two”
• “Oregon law * * * permits a not-guilty verdict by a vote of 11 to one or 10 to two.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martineau
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-16· cited 8×
• State v. Dippre
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-15· cited 7×
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-05· cited 4×
• State v. Juarez-Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-27· cited 2×
• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-10-30· cited 2×
• State v. Wayman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-19· cited 2×
• State v. Patino-Ochoa
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-15· cited 1×
• State v. Baez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-15
• State v. Minton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-27
• State v. De Mauro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-08
• El Pueblo v. Nelson Daniel Centeno
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2021-09-09

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 1,080×
• Apodaca v. Oregon
  Supreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 853×
• Holland v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 489×
• State v. Ulery
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-06-04· cited 143×
• STATE EX REL. DEWBERRY v. Kulongoski
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 16×