Skip to main content

State v. Dickson

Citations

  • 329 N.W.2d 630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding possession in a grand theft charge could be established through circumstantial evidence proven beyond a reasonable doubt
  • Because impeachment by criminal conviction “rulings are discretionary with the trial court, the standard of review is that an ‘abuse of discretion’ is required for reversible error.” (citing State v. Sahlie, 90 S.D. 682, 245 N.W.2d 476 (1976))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.