State v. Rudloff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that student athletes had a reduced privacy expectation because they voluntarily subjected themselves to a higher degree of regulation than students generally by \going out for the team\
• recognizing that “for many purposes ‘school authorities act in loco parentis’” (quoting Bethel School Dist. No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675, 684 (1986))
• concluding that interest in deterring drug use by schoolchil- dren was important in light of severe effects of drug use on adoles- cents
• stating that “[w]hen parents place minor children in private schools for their education, the teachers and administrators of those schools stand in loco parentis over the children entrusted to them”
• recognizing the possibility of the arbitrary and discriminatory imposition of suspicion-based drug tests
• observing that “there is an element of communal undress inherent in athletic participation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).