State v. Quinn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the specific intent element of theft which is not an element of misdemeanor “joy riding” under SDCL § 22-30A-12

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McCafferty
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-10-03· cited 88×
• State v. Blalack
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-12-14· cited 52×
• State v. Davis
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-03-04· cited 47×
• State v. Ford
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-12-28· cited 45×
• State v. Waller
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-09-14· cited 30×
• State v. Dickson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-02-09· cited 23×
• State v. Cochrun
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-01-05· cited 23×
• State v. Janisch
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 21×
• State v. Shult
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-01-08· cited 19×
• State v. King
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-04-11· cited 13×
• State v. Cross
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 12×
• State v. Williamson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-05-23· cited 9×
• State v. Disbrow
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-01-06· cited 3×
• State v. Shear
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-08-06· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Hoffmeister
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1975-05-27· cited 112×
• State v. Braley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1960-09-14· cited 65×
• Frawley Ranches, Inc. v. Lasher
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-09-28· cited 27×
• State v. Jacquith
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-11-30· cited 17×
• Walters v. Rock
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1908-02-21· cited 17×
• Powell v. Hartman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-12-11· cited 6×