State v. Mattson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we will not overturn evi-dentiary rulings unless they “in all probability ... produced some effect upon the final result”
• also holding that “refusal to provide a urine sample was sufficient to support an inference of knowing possession through ingestion”
• also holding that “refusal to provide a urine sample was sufficient to support an inference of knowing possession through ingestion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).