State v. Meeks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting statute that requires restitution unless shown to be \ 'unworkable' \ as authorizing courts to consider \present and future earning capacity\ (quoting Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-6604 (b)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-11-16· cited 22×
• State v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-02-21· cited 8×
• State v. Tucker
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-06-12· cited 8×
• State v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2024-07-26· cited 7×
• State v. Robison
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-06-26· cited 6×
• State v. Lucas Dwight
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2018-07-27· cited 2×
• State v. Henry
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-02-28· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dickey
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-05-22· cited 422×
• State v. Collins
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-12-23· cited 282×
• State ex rel. Schmidt v. City of Wichita
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2016-01-22· cited 148×
• State v. Hunziker
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-10-25· cited 69×
• State v. Alcala
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-04-24· cited 66×
• State v. Shank
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2016-04-15· cited 65×
• State v. Goeller
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 51×
• Commonwealth v. Henry
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-08-08· cited 36×
• State v. Herron
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-10-24· cited 24×
• Pratt v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-15· cited 16×
• State v. Orcutt
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-01-22· cited 9×
• State v. Hambright
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2017-01-13· cited 9×