Skip to main content

State v. Dickey

Citations

  • 50 Kan. App. 2d 468
  • 329 P.3d 1230
  • 2014 WL 2900957
  • 2014 Kan. App. LEXIS 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing die holding and analysis in Murdock as “firmly tethered” to the text of K.S.A. 21-471 l[e] and thus limited to out-of-state convictions
  • consideration of Descamps claim for first time on appeal necessary to serve ends of justice and to prevent denial of fundamental right
  • detailed discussion of categorical versus modified categorical approaches
  • subsequently affirmed in Dickey I
  • subsequently affirmed in Dickey I

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruns, Pierron, Plerron, Standridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.