State v. Dickey
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4397
Syllabus
PLEA — CRIM.R. 11(C) — VOLUNTARINESS — COERCION — CLERICAL ERROR — NUNC PRO TUNC: Where an allegation was made that the trial court gave \some indication\ that it would impose a sentence that would \very likely be less\ than the sentence offered by the State during plea negotiations, and where the trial court denied making any promises regarding sentencing, the record did not establish that the trial court's involvement in the plea-bargaining process rendered defendant's plea involuntary. Where the sentencing entry contains a clerical error incorrectly reflecting the count to which a weapon specification is attached, the error must be corrected with a nunc pro tunc entry on remand.
Judges: Crouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-21· cited 173×
- State v. ByrdOhio Supreme Court· 1980-07-30· cited 103×
- State v. Ware (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-26· cited 37×
- State v. GowdyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-08· cited 4×
- State v. ElcessOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.