Court of Appeals of Kansas· 9/13/2013
State v. Diaz
Citations
- 49 Kan. App. 2d 436
- 308 P.3d 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “an essential element of the crime of aggravated false impersonation requires proof that the defendant falsely impersonated an actual person” and holding that may be proven by circumstantial evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Burger, McAnany, Pierron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-01-22· cited 150×
- State v. ScaifeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-07-03· cited 141×
- State v. GomezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-07-09· cited 106×
- State v. RaskieSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-02-17· cited 105×
- State v. ComanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-30· cited 104×
- State v. FryeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-05-04· cited 101×
- State v. UrbanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-09-24· cited 98×
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-06-19· cited 49×
- State v. DaleSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-12-23· cited 47×
- City of Junction City v. GriffinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1980-03-01· cited 40×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-02· cited 27×
- State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-06-15· cited 12×
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-03-20· cited 6×
- State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1990-05-04· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.