Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/25/2019
State v. Diamond
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2527
Syllabus
The trial court erred in determining police officers did not have consent to enter the home, and it erred in suppressing the body camera footage obtained inside the home and T.T.'s statement based on that erroneous conclusion.
Judges: Luper Schuster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 2,237×
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court· 2013-03-26· cited 1,615×
- Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court· 2011-05-16· cited 1,457×
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court· 1978-05-31· cited 1,386×
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 1,382×
- Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 739×
- State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 477×
- Michigan v. FisherSupreme Court· 2009-12-07· cited 389×
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-10-01· cited 375×
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court· 2006-08-02· cited 348×
- Collins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2018-05-29· cited 347×
- State v. Banks-HarveyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 94×
- City of Athens v. WolfOhio Supreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 68×
- State v. PortmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-26· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.