State v. Diallo
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 2053
Syllabus
On appeal from the denial of a petition for postconviction relief without a hearing. The materials attached to the petition did not support the petitioner's allegation that the state knowingly elicited false or perjured testimony. The petitioner's unsubstantiated speculation about the existence of evidence outside the record did not support his allegation that the state destroyed or withheld evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Dingus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 376×
- United States v. Paul Lochmondy (88-2049) Charles Ludlow (88-2134)Sixth Circuit· 1989-11-28· cited 162×
- State v. HannaOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-22· cited 160×
- State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court· 1975-02-05· cited 138×
- State v. BunchOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-29· cited 64×
- State v. WidmerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-14· cited 54×
- State v. IaconaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 45×
- State v. RosalesOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-19· cited 18×
- State v. SullivanOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-27· cited 10×
- State v. DialloOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-18· cited 7×
- State v. DialloOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.