Arizona Supreme Court· 2/25/1997
State v. Detrich
Citations
- 932 P.2d 1328
- 188 Ariz. 57
- 237 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 1997 Ariz. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that defendant relished murder and demonstrated an “abhorrent lack of regard for human life” based on defendant’s statement to his co-defendant, “It’s dead, but it’s warm. Do you want a shot at it?”
- observing that Arizona follows the federal standard stated in Wainwright
- “The purpose of a contemporaneous objection requirement is to allow for an immediate remedy for potentially improper or unconstitutional activities.”
- When a disparity in sentences results from an appropriate plea agreement, disparity is not mitigating.
- “Collateral estoppel in criminal cases is an ‘integral part of the protection against double jeopardy guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.’ ”
- motion for new trial based on juror bias requires affidavit from juror
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moeller, Zlaket, Jones, Feldman, Martone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-08-22· cited 543×
- Detrich v. RyanNinth Circuit· 2013-09-03· cited 142×
- State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court· 1999-03-02· cited 125×
- Robinson v. SchriroNinth Circuit· 2010-02-22· cited 103×
- State v. MedinaArizona Supreme Court· 1999-03-04· cited 98×
- State v. CanezArizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 94×
- State of Arizona v. Johnathan Ian BurnsArizona Supreme Court· 2015-03-10· cited 88×
- State v. CañezArizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 80×
- State v. KayerArizona Supreme Court· 1999-06-29· cited 75×
- State v. MurdaughArizona Supreme Court· 2004-09-15· cited 58×
- State of Arizona v. Shawn Patrick LynchArizona Supreme Court· 2015-09-10· cited 35×
- State v. ClabourneArizona Supreme Court· 1999-06-18· cited 28×
- State v. PrasertphongArizona Supreme Court· 2003-09-02· cited 23×
- David G. v. Pollard Ex Rel. County of PimaArizona Supreme Court· 2004-03-23· cited 20×
- State v. UriarteCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-08-27· cited 19×
- Detrich v. RyanNinth Circuit· 2012-05-02· cited 16×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-07-20· cited 14×
- Zuluaga ex rel. Zuluaga v. Bashas', Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-02-03· cited 11×
- Detrich v. RyanNinth Circuit· 2010-08-20· cited 8×
- State of Arizona v. Oscar Castillo MendozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-03-14· cited 8×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,718×
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,614×
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-06· cited 374×
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 276×
- State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court· 1989-04-11· cited 211×
- State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 206×
- Harris v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1971-11-16· cited 200×
- State v. LaversArizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-23· cited 189×
- State v. KnappArizona Supreme Court· 1977-03-09· cited 183×
- State v. HydeArizona Supreme Court· 1996-07-09· cited 167×
- State v. WaltonArizona Supreme Court· 1989-02-02· cited 167×
- State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court· 1989-07-11· cited 146×
- State v. SchurzArizona Supreme Court· 1993-04-15· cited 139×
- State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court· 1978-04-14· cited 132×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.