David G. v. Pollard Ex Rel. County of Pima

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding trial court erred when it allowed a jury trial for a juvenile charged with traffic offenses because forcing a juvenile to be tried by a jury did not promote informality and flexibility of juvenile system and subjected juvenile to very stigma legislature sought to prevent
• concluding trial court erred when it allowed a jury trial for a juvenile charged with traffic offenses because forcing a juvenile to be tried by a jury did not promote informality and flexibility of juvenile system and subjected juvenile to very stigma leg islature sought to prevent
• “[A] determination that [a] juvenile committed a delinquent act is not considered to be a criminal conviction.”
• “[A] determination that [a] juvenile committed a delinquent act is not considered to be a criminal conviction.”
• “From the inception of the juvenile justice system, courts have recognized that juvenile cases involved special interests that could not be adequately addressed by the adult criminal system.”
• “From the inception of the juvenile justice system, courts have recognized that juvenile cases involved special interests that could not be adequately addressed by the adult criminal system.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).