Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/25/2009
State v. Denney
Citations
- 152 Wash. App. 665
- 218 P.3d 633
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statements made in reply to questions that are reasonably likely to produce an incriminating response are not admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridgewater, Deren, Penoyar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court· 2014-06-26· cited 211×
- State v. DenneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-10-20· cited 4×
- Majority OpinionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-26
- State v. DenneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-25
- State of Washington v. Austin James ButlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2025-06-10
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- United States v. Donald Gene BoothNinth Circuit· 1982-02-08· cited 293×
- State v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court· 1987-06-04· cited 103×
- State v. SargentWashington Supreme Court· 1988-10-27· cited 100×
- State v. HandleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-07-05· cited 12×
- State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-03-31· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.