Eldridge v. Eldridge
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 233
Syllabus
The trial court's conclusion that the contested expense was a medical expense was supported by the record, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding Appellant in contempt of court for his failure to pay this expense. The trial court, however, abused its discretion regarding the attorney's fee award because the amount awarded was not supported by the record. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for the entry of a modified judgment.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 940×
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-08-09· cited 830×
- Holcomb v. HolcombOhio Supreme Court· 1989-07-26· cited 599×
- State ex rel. Ventrone v. BirkelOhio Supreme Court· 1981-03-11· cited 292×
- State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-16· cited 71×
- Janis v. JanisOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-07-29· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.