Skip to main content

Eldridge v. Eldridge

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 233

Syllabus

The trial court's conclusion that the contested expense was a medical expense was supported by the record, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding Appellant in contempt of court for his failure to pay this expense. The trial court, however, abused its discretion regarding the attorney's fee award because the amount awarded was not supported by the record. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for the entry of a modified judgment.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.