State of Missouri v. Leroy Coleman, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the existence and extent of an assumed duty is generally a question of 17 fact
• noting “the nature of the services undertaken must be for the specific 21 purpose protecting against harm”
• rejecting argument that court could not consider case-specific facts to determine as a matter of law that a defendant had not assumed a duty to plaintiff
• rejecting an argument that a court could not consider case-specific facts to determine as a matter of law that defendant had not assumed a duty to plaintiff
• noting that Arizona has adopted § 324A
• discussing a multi-tenant commercial building premises liability claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).