Skip to main content

State v. Salgado

Citations

  • 948 So. 2d 12
  • 2006 WL 3208503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no evidence to show that the 21-year-old defendant was unable to appreciate consequences; age and conclusion of immaturity alone are not sufficient
  • finding downward departure unwarranted where no evidence that the 21 year old defendant was emotionally immature, lacked ordinary intelligence or was otherwise unable to appreciate the consequences of his offenses
  • no evidence to show that 21-year-old defendant was unable to appreciate consequences; age and conclusion of immaturity alone are not sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez, Suarez, and Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.