Skip to main content

King v. State

Citations

  • 590 So. 2d 1032
  • 1991 WL 265076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that a department of corrections printout is inadmissible to prove habitual felony offender status
  • finding that probation officer’s testimony as to appellant’s release date was hearsay, and without the testimony, evidence was insufficient to support finding that appellant was habitual felony offender
  • finding the defendant's hearsay objection sufficient where the state failed to satisfy the foundational requirements of section 90.803(6) for admission of a computer printout at sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.