United States v. James Douglas, Martin L. Pruitt, Leon Mason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that the Supreme Court \has never held that a reviewing court must review the sufficiency of the evidence whenever a defendant raises the issue on appeal\
• observing that the Supreme Court “has never held that a reviewing court must review the sufficiency of the evidence whenever a defendant raises the issue on appeal,” and reasoning that Richardson precludes a “broad reading” of Burks as having adopted such a requirement
• “the complained of discrepancies went to immaterial and collateral issues”
• \the complained of discrepancies went to immaterial and collateral issues\
• credit sales constituted evidence of participation in drug conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).