State v. Balanza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss on de minimis grounds where his expert witness’ testimony was inadmissible
• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to dismiss on de minimis grounds where his expert witness' testimony was inadmissible
• holding that without supporting affidavits or sworn statements, the defendant's characterization of the witnesses' potential testimony \amounts 11 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER to nothing more than speculation\
• noting that “[b]efore a trial court can address whether an offense constitutes a de minimis infraction, the court must make factual determinations regarding the circumstances of the offense”
• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Reed's motion for bill of particulars when Reed did not deny that the transcripts of the preliminary hearing and police reports provided him with the information that he claimed was lacking in the complaint
• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Reed’s motion for bill of particulars when Reed did not deny that the transcripts of the preliminary hearing and police reports provided him with the information that he claimed was lacking in the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).