Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 530 A.2d 1223
  • 310 Md. 611
  • 1987 Md. LEXIS 283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • extended proportionality analysis not required due to Maryland’s serious treatment of daytime housebreaking and the stringent requirements for qualifying offenses under Maryland’s recidivist statute
  • “The ‘daytime’ aspect of § 30(b) is not used to define or characterize the crime, but merely to distinguish it from burglary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.