Court of Appeals of Washington· 10/22/1980
State v. Davis
Citations
- 618 P.2d 1034
- 27 Wash. App. 498
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- `It cannot be said that a defendant had a fair trial... if the jury might assume that an essential element need not be proven.'
- due process requires jury to be instructed as to each element of robbery because legal definition of robbery is not a matter of common understanding
- due process requires jury to be instructed as to each element of robbery because legal definition of robbery is not a matter of common understanding
- “It cannot be said that a defendant had a fair trial... if the jury might assume that an essential element need not be proven.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court· 1985-09-05· cited 721×
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 576×
- State v. NgWashington Supreme Court· 1988-02-18· cited 225×
- State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court· 1985-12-12· cited 220×
- In re the Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court· 2005-05-05· cited 168×
- In Re Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court· 2005-05-05· cited 165×
- State v. RikerWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-03· cited 161×
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 155×
- State v. HandranWashington Supreme Court· 1989-07-25· cited 134×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1985-10-03· cited 122×
- State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court· 1984-03-15· cited 80×
- State v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court· 1990-03-22· cited 45×
- State v. OlmedoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-07-18· cited 38×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-03-02· cited 31×
- State v. O'DONNELLCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-12-27· cited 25×
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-08-15· cited 20×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 20×
- State v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-01-17· cited 13×
- City of Seattle v. NorbyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-10-20· cited 13×
- State v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-05-13· cited 13×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- State v. HolsworthWashington Supreme Court· 1980-02-14· cited 169×
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court· 1977-02-24· cited 160×
- Wood v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court· 1976-09-23· cited 146×
- State v. McHenryWashington Supreme Court· 1977-09-08· cited 78×
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court· 1980-08-12· cited 55×
- State v. HantonWashington Supreme Court· 1980-08-07· cited 47×
- City of Seattle v. GreenWashington Supreme Court· 1958-03-13· cited 43×
- State v. PawlingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-04-30· cited 33×
- State v. BromleyWashington Supreme Court· 1967-10-05· cited 30×
- State v. VargasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-10· cited 29×
- Miesbauer v. RhayWashington Supreme Court· 1971-08-12· cited 18×
- State v. VanderveerWashington Supreme Court· 1921-03-30· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.