Arizona Supreme Court· 10/29/2003

State v. Dann

Citations

79 P.3d 58
206 Ariz. 371
412 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
2003 Ariz. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding murders motivationally related when defendant went to an apartment intending to kill one victim and killed two others “simply because they were there”
reaffirming that the state can establish the (F)(8) aggravator where the killings occurred during a “short, uninterrupted span of time”
asking whether, after reviewing the evidence, a reasonable jury would weigh the mitigation evidence differently and thus reach a different result
finding temporal element established when murders occurred in a “short, uninterrupted span of time”
finding a spatial relationship where all three victims “died in the front room of [an] apartment, where they had been seated near one another”
finding a temporal relationship when undisputed evidence showed that the murders occurred in a “short, uninterrupted span of time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berch, Jones, McGregor, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.