Skip to main content

State v. Daniels

Citations

  • 343 N.W.2d 411
  • 117 Wis. 2d 9
  • 1983 Wisc. App. LEXIS 4144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the import of new Wis. Stat. § 906.01 in the context of a child witness
  • \A sentence well within the limits of the maximum sentence is not so disproportionate to the offense committed\ so as to be unduly harsh and excessive.
  • \A sentence well within the limits of the maximum sentence is not so disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock the public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning what is right and proper under the circumstances.\
  • \A sentence well within the limits of the maximum sentence is not so disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock the public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning what is right and proper under the circumstances.\
  • \An appellate court will only substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact [regarding credibility determinations when the evidence is] inherently or patently incredible-that kind of evidence which conflicts with nature or with fully established or conceded facts.\
  • sentence well within statutory limits is not excessive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wedemeyer, Decker, Moser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.