State v. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that this policy, recognized in Spannuth, survived the adoption of the current rules of appellate procedure
• failure of prison to provide mental-health treatment envisioned by trial court is not ground for sentence modification; \[p]risoners are entitled to challenge the conditions of their confinement by appropriate writs\
• failure of prison to provide mental-health treatment envisioned by trial court is not ground for sentence modification; \ [prisoners are entitled to challenge the conditions of their confinement by appropriate writs\
• Once a prison term is selected, the trial court may not order specific treatment; control over the care of prisoners is vested by statute in the overseeing department.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wickstrom
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-03-06· cited 69×
• State v. Krieger
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1991-05-01· cited 41×
• State v. Daniels
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1983-12-07· cited 39×
• State v. Meyer
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1989-03-01· cited 9×
• Foster v. McCaughtry
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1992-05-22
• Lemay v. Gudmanson
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1995-08-24

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Estelle v. Gamble
  Supreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
• Bowring v. Godwin
  Fourth Circuit· 1977-03-18· cited 503×
• Rust v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-09-15· cited 56×
• Anderson v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-03-15· cited 25×
• State v. Gibbons
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1976-01-06· cited 17×
• Tritt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-03-26· cited 8×