State v. Richard G.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A statute is ambiguous if it has more than one reasonable interpretation when applied to the facts of a particular case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Courtney F. v. Ramiro M.C.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-01-21· cited 6×
• Deputy v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2005-06-16· cited 2×
• United States v. Donavan White Owl
  Eighth Circuit· 2022-07-05· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Trammel v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 1,217×
• People v. Sinohui
  California Supreme Court· 2002-06-13· cited 106×
• Truttschel v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1997-01-30· cited 99×
• State v. Daniels
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1983-12-07· cited 39×
• State v. Jagielski
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1991-02-26· cited 5×