State v. Daniel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring that sentencing provisions of sections 124.401(5), 901.5(10) and 903.1 be read together to ascertain legislative intent
• “[T]he district court may not use the penalty provisions provided in section 903.1(1) if a specific penalty is provided in another statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2000-09-07· cited 58×
• State v. Nail
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2007-12-28· cited 53×
• State v. DeCamp
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2001-02-14· cited 38×
• State v. Kostman
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1998-09-23· cited 15×
• State v. Carstens
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1999-04-28· cited 8×
• State v. Kramer
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2009-08-19· cited 7×
• State Of Iowa Vs. Dawn Marie Nail And Joshua Kucera
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2007-12-28

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ohio v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 1984-08-02· cited 1,064×
• State v. Hildebrand
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1979-06-27· cited 129×
• State v. Ahitow
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1996-02-14· cited 48×
• Dressler v. Iowa Department of Transportation
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1996-01-17· cited 22×
• State v. Bell
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1997-12-24· cited 11×
• Iowa Department of Transportation v. Iowa District Court for Woodbury County
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1992-07-22· cited 9×
• State v. Frazer
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1987-03-18· cited 5×