Court of Appeals of Iowa· 8/19/2009

State v. Kramer

Citations

773 N.W.2d 897
2009 Iowa App. LEXIS 926
2009 WL 2514091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the district court abused its discretion in determining that it had no discretion to suspend the fine portion of a sentence, vacating that portion of the sentence, and “remand[ing] for resentencing to allow the district 10 court to exercise its discretion”
“Failing to exercise discretion in determining what sentence to impose when a sentence is not mandatory is a defective sentencing procedure, which requires vacation of the sentence and a remand for resentencing.”
“Failing to exercise discretion in determining what sentence to impose when a sentence is not mandatory is a 6 defective sentencing procedure, which requires vacation of the sentence and a remand for resentencing.”
noting a specific sentencing 6 statute controls over a general sentencing statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sackett, Vogel, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.