Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/24/2008
State v. Daniel
Citations
- 193 P.3d 1021
- 222 Or. App. 362
- 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1294
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- overruling earlier cases and holding that a defect in an indictment is not a jurisdictional error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Schuman, Deits
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Apollonio.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-10-10· cited 41×
- State v. MurgaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-04-25· cited 23×
- State v. SpreadburyMontana Supreme Court· 2011-07-26· cited 13×
- State v. SerbinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-22· cited 9×
- State v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-02-26· cited 8×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 3,303×
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court· 1887-03-28· cited 814×
- State v. TerryOregon Supreme Court· 2001-12-28· cited 88×
- State v. BirchfieldOregon Supreme Court· 2007-04-19· cited 69×
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-05-22· cited 21×
- State v. MoroneyOregon Supreme Court· 1980-09-10· cited 16×
- State v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-04-17· cited 13×
- Riggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-01-19· cited 9×
- State v. Ascencio-GalindoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-25· cited 6×
- State v. ChoinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-05· cited 6×
- State v. ASCENCIO-GALINDOOregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-06· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.