State v. Morales-Mulato

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although interviewer’s testimony that, in her opinion, 11-year-old complainant had been sexually abused was improper vouching for complainant’s credibility, it was harmless error, and affirming because evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).