Nebraska Supreme Court· 11/13/2015

State v. Custer

Citations

292 Neb. 88

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining that prosecutor’s comment on defendant’s prearrest, pre-Miranda silence was permissible because prior cases have viewed giving Miranda warnings as triggering event that prevents State from using defendant’s silence
noting that “a court’s proper role is to interpret statutes and clarify their meaning
determining that prosecutor’s comment on defendant’s prearrest, pre-Miranda silence was permissible because prior cases have viewed giving Miranda warnings as triggering event that prevents State from using defendant’s silence
addressing as plain error and modifying sentencing order to reflect proper credit for time served
stating appel- lant’s failure to include proposed jury instruction in record on appeal precluded appellate determination of whether tendered instruction was correct statement of law and was warranted by evidence
appellant’s failure to include proposed jury instruction in record on appeal precluded appellate determination of whether tendered instruction was correct statement of law and was warranted by evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Custer

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.