State v. Custer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing doctrine of substantial completion, but holding it inapplicable on facts of case
• car that is moving when police initiated traffic stop is considered “mobile” for automobile exception purposes
• car that is moving when police initiated traffic stop is considered \mobile\ for automobile exception purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bailey-Allen Co., Inc. v. Kurzet
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-05-31· cited 31×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-22· cited 21×
• State v. Snow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-30· cited 7×
• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-06· cited 6×
• State v. Custer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-02-19· cited 5×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-09-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 168×
• State v. Atkinson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 164×
• Nelson v. Lane County
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-09-15· cited 119×
• State v. Willhite
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-01-15· cited 21×
• State v. Warner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-30· cited 16×
• State v. Gaunce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-08· cited 12×