State v. Ely

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in the brief of the party asserting the error to be considered by an appellate court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ely
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2017-01-20· cited 361×
• State v. Custer
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-11-13· cited 75×
• State v. Gleaton
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2024-03-08· cited 18×
• Jeremiah J. v. Dakota D.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2014-03-07· cited 17×
• State v. Patton
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2014-04-11· cited 17×
• State v. Loyuk
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-01-30· cited 15×
• State v. Haynie
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2024-08-16· cited 15×
• ConAgra Foods v. Zimmerman
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2014-05-09· cited 9×
• State v. Ely
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2020-07-10· cited 5×
• State v. Clark
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2014-07-08
• State v. Wulf
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2014-07-22
• State v. Glazebrook
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2015-01-06
• State v. Hale
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-02-06
• State v. Johnson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-05-15

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bjorklund
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-02-25· cited 265×
• State v. Mata
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2008-02-08· cited 248×
• State v. Watt
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2013-04-12· cited 228×
• State v. Aldaco
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2006-03-03· cited 99×
• State v. Valverde
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2013-07-19· cited 98×