Nicole Prager v. Joyce Honda, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding respondent’s failure to file tax returns in accordance with federal law was a violation of rule 32:8.4(b), even though he was never criminally charged
• imposing a public reprimand for an attorney who failed to file required tax returns, but noting that the attorney did not realize that he needed to file the returns
• finding no rule 32:8.4(d) violation when attorney failed to file tax returns and there was no showing the failure affected any court proceeding or an ancillary system supportive of any court proceeding
• considering prior ethical practices in fashioning sanction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).