Supreme Court of New Jersey· 7/10/1986
Veazey v. Doremus
Citations
- 510 A.2d 1187
- 103 N.J. 244
- 1986 N.J. LEXIS 965
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the governmental interest test to New Jersey choice of law analysis and applying the law of the state with the greatest interest in the issue
- characterizing Simmons as having adopted “the more flexible governmental-interest analysis in choice-of-law decisions”
- Courts must “identify the governmental policies underlying the law of each state and how those policies are affected by each state’s contacts to the litigation and the parties.”
- “If a state’s contacts are not related to the policies underlying its law, then that state does not possess an interest in having its law apply.”
- parties’ contacts relevant only if they relate to policy of the law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pollock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
133 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
- PV Ex Rel. TV v. Camp JayceeSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-11-24· cited 215×
- Velasquez v. FranzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-04-25· cited 155×
- Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.D. New Jersey· 1999-10-28· cited 155×
- Mehlman v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-03-26· cited 140×
- Gantes v. Kason Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-07-23· cited 129×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2000-10-03· cited 125×
- Li Fu v. Hong FuSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-07-26· cited 115×
- Rowe v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-03-29· cited 106×
- Marks v. StrubleD. New Jersey· 2004-11-18· cited 101×
- Erny v. Estate of MerolaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-01-30· cited 97×
- Andrew McCarrell v. Hoffman-La Roach, Inc.(076524)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2017-01-24· cited 94×
- Dewey v. VOLKSWAGEN AGD. New Jersey· 2008-04-01· cited 69×
- Gutman v. Howard Savings BankD. New Jersey· 1990-11-27· cited 63×
- Bondi v. Citigroup, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-12-22· cited 62×
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-06-11· cited 61×
- Diamond Shamrock Chemicals v. AetnaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-06-04· cited 61×
- Warriner v. StantonThird Circuit· 2007-01-18· cited 53×
- Harper v. LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC.D. New Jersey· 2009-02-03· cited 50×
- D'AGOSTINO v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-06-28· cited 49×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-10-28· cited 186×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-07-25· cited 167×
- Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1970-07-10· cited 153×
- Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1967-04-24· cited 151×
- Merenoff v. MerenoffSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-06-01· cited 133×
- Wilmot v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1980-10-06· cited 104×
- McSwain v. McSwainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-01-04· cited 95×
- Schwartz v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court· 1968-11-20· cited 83×
- Henry v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Third Circuit· 1975-01-22· cited 83×
- Pfau v. Trent Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1970-03-17· cited 81×
- Koplik v. C. P. Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1958-05-05· cited 67×
- Wartell v. FormusaIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-01-25· cited 64×
- Berghammer v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa· 1971-03-11· cited 58×
- Raisen v. RaisenSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-12-20· cited 49×
- White v. SmithD. New Jersey· 1975-07-21· cited 40×
- Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-04-29· cited 36×
- Snowten v. US Fidelity and Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-29· cited 23×
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1966-01-31· cited 20×
- Zweifel v. MorganNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-11-12· cited 5×
- Edmunds v. EdmundsDistrict of Columbia· 1972-10-04· cited 5×
Other cases named Veazey v. Doremus
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.