State v. Curry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rule is violated where psychiatrist testified that the reason he concluded that defendant knew the difference between right and wrong is that defendant said that he did.
• instruction which is correct statement of law but is incomplete is improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hunter
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-13· cited 75×
• Stone v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1987-11-25· cited 31×
• State v. Kreps
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1983-03-18· cited 19×
• State v. Venegas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-04-19· cited 14×
• Siler v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 12×
• Carter v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2010-10-14· cited 10×
• State v. Hudson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-12-31· cited 8×
• State v. Torres
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-10-24· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Parker v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-06-06· cited 60×
• State v. Evans
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-05-28· cited 27×
• State v. Cooper
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-12-18· cited 23×
• State v. Porter
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-05-07· cited 11×
• State v. Clark
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-01-16· cited 8×