State v. Venegas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the defendant’s “particular use of the automobile made the automobile a dangerous instrument” for purposes of satisfying the statutory definition of “dangerous instrument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sette
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-08-11· cited 30×
• State v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-07-24· cited 25×
• State v. Orduno
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-01-10· cited 23×
• State v. McKeon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-01-24· cited 20×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-12-10· cited 17×
• State v. Woodall
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-07-16· cited 14×
• State v. Tamplin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-04-24· cited 6×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-06-27· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Ray
  California Supreme Court· 1975-04-17· cited 106×
• People v. Kelly
  California Supreme Court· 1973-12-26· cited 88×
• Coe Kane v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1969-01-20· cited 66×
• State v. Cooper
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-12-18· cited 23×
• United States v. Allan Anthony Burnim
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-06-05· cited 22×
• State v. Curry
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-07-30· cited 11×
• State v. Carrillo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-09-23· cited 5×