Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/28/2008

State v. Eckert

Citations

185 P.3d 564
220 Or. App. 274
2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

in assessing “whether the erroneous admission of disputed evidence was harmless, we describe and review all pertinent portions of the record”
in assessing “whether the erroneous admission of disputed evidence was harmless, we describe and review all pertinent portions of the record”
evidentiary error had little likelihood of affecting the verdict where “[t]he jury was presented with overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt” and “[important parts of that evidence are not in dispute”
evidentiary error had little likelihood of affecting the verdict where \[t]he jury was presented with overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt\ and \[i]mportant parts of that evidence are not in dispute\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.