State v. Strasser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The erroneous exclusion of evidence is harmless if a factfinder would have regarded the evidence as duplicative or unhelpful to its deliberations.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Aguilar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-11-12· cited 11×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-16· cited 8×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Cunningham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-10-21· cited 56×
• State v. Cunningham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-06· cited 27×
• State v. Perkins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-09· cited 22×
• State v. Blaylock
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-10· cited 18×