Skip to main content

State v. Frinell

Citations

  • 414 P.3d 430
  • 290 Or. App. 296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the undisputed purpose of ORS 136.760 to 136.792 was to safe- guard the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial on sentence enhancement facts
  • holding that the imposition of a dispositional departure sentence required notice to defendant of the state's intent to rely on enhancement facts, and that those enhancement-fact findings had to be made by a jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aoyagi, Dehoog, Hadlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.