State v. Carrillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court committed plain error by not applying the 200-percent rule where the parties treated all of the counts as arising out of the same criminal epi- sode
• accepting state’s concession on failure to apply 200-percent rule and exercising discretion to address claim as one of plain error
• exercising discretion to correct as plain error consecutive sentences that exceeded maximum allow- able under the 200-percent rule by seven months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Decleve
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-09-25· cited 7×
• State v. Redmond
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-19· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Miller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-08-05· cited 45×
• State v. Cuevas
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-11-13· cited 20×
• Orchard v. Mills
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 11×
• State v. Lundstedt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-07· cited 4×
• State v. HIEU DOAN TRUONG
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-28· cited 3×