State v. Crawford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a suspect’s questions about the charge and “what it carried and so forth” did not evince a desire for generalized discussion about the investigation
• inquiring about “the charge itself * * * what it carried and so forth” did not show willingness to discuss the investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hebert
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-01-16· cited 130×
• State v. Gonzalez
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-09-06· cited 30×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Thai/Schmolling
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-12-27· cited 9×
• State v. Jordan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-04· cited 8×
• State v. Cavallaro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-09· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Edwards v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
• Rhode Island v. Innis
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
• Fare v. Michael C.
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
• Oregon v. Bradshaw
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
• Smith v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
• State v. Barmon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-03-14· cited 25×
• State v. Fitzgerald
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-12-01· cited 12×