Skip to main content

Mangum v. State

Citations

  • 676 A.2d 80
  • 342 Md. 392
  • 1996 Md. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to define a handgun one must refer to several interlocking subsections of the statute in which a number of terms are defined by cross-references
  • noting that possession of ammunition is circumstantial evidence of operability of gun
  • discussing former § 36B(b) of Article 27, the predecessor statute to current § 4-203 of the Criminal Law Article
  • rejecting the premise that circumstantial evidence is in some manner inferior to direct evidence
  • interpreting Md. Rule 4-263(b)(5), an earlier version of Md. Rule 4-263(d)(9)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.