Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/15/1996
Mangum v. State
Citations
- 676 A.2d 80
- 342 Md. 392
- 1996 Md. LEXIS 48
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that to define a handgun one must refer to several interlocking subsections of the statute in which a number of terms are defined by cross-references
- noting that possession of ammunition is circumstantial evidence of operability of gun
- discussing former § 36B(b) of Article 27, the predecessor statute to current § 4-203 of the Criminal Law Article
- rejecting the premise that circumstantial evidence is in some manner inferior to direct evidence
- interpreting Md. Rule 4-263(b)(5), an earlier version of Md. Rule 4-263(d)(9)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Braxton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-06· cited 43×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-19· cited 42×
- Hagez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-05-30· cited 32×
- Mora v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-25· cited 19×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-02· cited 18×
- Handy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-08-31· cited 17×
- Curtin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-07· cited 15×
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-01-15· cited 15×
- Smiley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-04· cited 9×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-08-31· cited 8×
- State v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-01-30· cited 6×
- Moye v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-09· cited 5×
- Ware v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-07· cited 5×
- United States v. RobsonD. Maryland· 2005-10-13· cited 5×
- In Re Lavar D.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-30· cited 4×
- Blumenthal Kahn Electric Ltd. Partnership v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-04-06· cited 3×
- In re: David P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-09-27· cited 1×
- Jamsa v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-10-28
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-01-31· cited 3,238×
- Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-11-04· cited 238×
- People v. GeraciNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-03-28· cited 220×
- Derr v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1991-11-08· cited 214×
- United States v. CasamentoSecond Circuit· 1989-10-11· cited 208×
- St. Joseph Hospital v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 177×
- State v. GosbyWashington Supreme Court· 1975-08-28· cited 153×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-05-29· cited 115×
- Francesco Polizzi v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1991-02-25· cited 84×
- Hebron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-22· cited 80×
- Bernard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-05-31· cited 80×
- Larry Kinder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 66×
- Thomas Mallette v. Charles J. Scully, Superintendent of Greenhaven Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1984-12-28· cited 63×
- McBride v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-24· cited 63×
- Orrin W. Payne, Cross-Appellant v. Robert Borg, Warden, Cross-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1993-03-03· cited 59×
- United States v. Shirlene Wood, United States of America v. Ronald McKinley Lee, Sr.D.C. Circuit· 1989-07-21· cited 54×
- State Ex Rel. Mahoney v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1954-10-29· cited 53×
- Peterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-03-30· cited 44×
- Bartley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-08-31· cited 41×
- Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-10-19· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.