Court of Appeals of Arizona· 4/8/1986
State v. Tyler
Citations
- 718 P.2d 214
- 149 Ariz. 312
- 1986 Ariz. App. LEXIS 456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the denial of a Willits instruction because the State has \no duty to seek out and gain\ evidence unless \it is aware\ the evidence is material to the defense
- finding no abuse of discretion when trial court permitted an untimely-disclosed witness to testify where defendant had enough time to interview the witness — witness disclosed two days before trial and seven days before her testimony
- rejecting need for a Willits instruction where “[a]t the time the weapon was seized, the officer had no reason to know what the defendant’s defense would be concerning [the fingerprints defendant claimed were on the weapon]”
- no abuse of discretion in denying discovery of medical records where effect of witness’s illness and medication on his memory was already known by defendant
- defining “control” as “[t]o exercise power or influence over”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corcoran, Kleinschmidt, Eubank
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CoxArizona Supreme Court· 2007-12-21· cited 102×
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-07-23· cited 61×
- State v. CarlosCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-01-25· cited 34×
- State v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-12-15· cited 21×
- State of Arizona v. Raymond Anthony HallCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-03-20· cited 21×
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-05-07· cited 15×
- State of Arizona v. Rock Kelly IngramCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-02-11· cited 14×
- State of Arizona v. Pablo Isaac HernandezArizona Supreme Court· 2020-10-27· cited 13×
- State v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-04-16· cited 12×
- State v. SongArizona Supreme Court· 1993-09-28· cited 7×
- State of Arizona v. Kevin Ottar and Ruan Junior HamiltonArizona Supreme Court· 2013-06-26· cited 5×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-14· cited 3×
- State v. BuonafedeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-05-01· cited 2×
- State of Arizona v. Gary Edward CoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-03-29
- State of Arizona v. Oscar Manuel LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-09-15
- Brown v. DembowCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-02-25
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1978-05-30· cited 844×
- State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-30· cited 227×
- State v. WillitsArizona Supreme Court· 1964-06-11· cited 207×
- State v. PerezArizona Supreme Court· 1984-04-23· cited 158×
- State v. ZuckArizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-15· cited 115×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1979-07-26· cited 93×
- State v. AxleyArizona Supreme Court· 1982-05-10· cited 89×
- State v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court· 1984-07-17· cited 62×
- United States v. Norman N. WolfsonFifth Circuit· 1978-05-18· cited 39×
- State v. KevilArizona Supreme Court· 1974-10-17· cited 39×
- State v. PhinisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-07-12· cited 33×
- State v. NealSupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-12-07· cited 33×
- State v. LujanArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-06· cited 31×
- State v. GambleArizona Supreme Court· 1974-06-05· cited 28×
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-09-27· cited 28×
- State v. RunnelsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1969-06-14· cited 27×
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1968-09-26· cited 25×
- State v. PiattArizona Supreme Court· 1981-12-29· cited 23×
- State v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court· 1977-09-30· cited 20×
- State v. StewartArizona Supreme Court· 1984-01-04· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.